Sudan’s War Beyond Two Generals: A Structural Islamist Power Play
The Illusion of a Generals’ Duel Reducing Sudan’s war to a clash between two commanders oversimplifies a deeper transformation. The conflict reflects a long-term Islamist state capture strategy rooted in Muslim Brotherhood institutional penetration. What appears as military fragmentation is, in reality, structural consolidation beneath the surface of chaos. Tehran’s Quiet Expansion Through Islamist Intermediaries Sudan represents geopolitical depth for Tehran. The alignment between Sudanese Islamist actors and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps demonstrates pragmatic Sunni–Shia cooperation. Through networks historically overlapping with Hezbollah, Sudan becomes a logistics corridor — enabling weapons transfers and influence projection without overt Iranian deployment. Parallel Economies and Militant Finance Corridors State fragility creates space for hybrid systems: ideological governance fused with illicit trade. Sudan increasingly functions as a node linking Hamas-adjacent...